Practical research tool

Best of Evidence

Best of Evidence is an evidence-guided selection approach that ranks candidate answers by the quality, coverage, and verifiability of their supporting sources. This site adapts the research term to citation assessment, rewarding checkable claims and primary sources rather than confidence or writing style alone.

Try it now

Rank answers by their evidence

Put one candidate per line as “Name | claim | source URLs”. The heuristic rewards citations, specificity, and checkable detail.

Live result

Answer C has the strongest evidence

81/100 evidence score with 2 sources.

  1. Answer C81
  2. Answer A64
  3. Answer B5

What is Best of Evidence for AI answers?

Built and reviewed by Imran
Reviewed 26 July 2026

How does it work?

  1. Separate each candidate answer into its important factual claims.
  2. Check which claims have direct support and whether the sources are primary and authoritative.
  3. Rank the candidates by evidence coverage, specificity, and verifiability.

When is it useful?

  • Choosing among several sourced research summaries.
  • Reviewing an AI answer before it is shared with customers or executives.
  • Comparing citation quality independently from prose quality.

Example: three answers, one checkable winner

An answer with a precise claim and two primary sources should generally outrank a fluent answer with no sources. The score makes that preference explicit, but a reviewer should still open the sources and confirm that they support the claim.

What are the limitations?

  • A URL count cannot prove that a source actually entails the associated claim.
  • This tool adapts Best-of-Evidence research and does not reproduce its partial-verification method.

Questions about Best of Evidence

Does more citations mean a better AI answer?

Not necessarily. Citation quality, claim coverage, and whether each source truly supports the claim matter more than raw citation count.

What is a primary source?

A primary source is the original paper, dataset, standard, official documentation, filing, or first-party record behind a factual claim.

Can this tool verify citations automatically?

No. It provides a transparent first-pass score. A human or dedicated verifier should inspect each source and its relationship to the claim.

One useful idea when the research moves. No noise.